COMPARATIVE STUDY ON BEHAVIOUR OF GEOCELL REINFORCED PAVEMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjoest.v6i3.221Keywords:
geocell, dune sand, pavement bearing capacity, placement of geocellAbstract
Infrastructure has become a major force for national development. Therefore, the development of ground improvement technology for weak subgrade composition has become an important goal in geotechnical engineering applications. Geosynthetics is one of the ground improvement techniques to improve bearing capacity of problematic subgrade soil. Geocell, the cell matrix expands to create radial stress and provide stability to the subgrade composition soil. In the past few years, the use of geocells and other methods to improve the properties of problematic soil, especially in pavement and foundation engineering, has been investigated. This paper focuses on presenting parameters such as increased bearing capacity, decreased settlement and increased stiffness when reinforcing various types of collapsible soils by addressing laboratory tests and field investigations for geocell configuration and highlights their advantages in various applications and future research. Research shows that geocells can improve the properties of problematic subgrade soil, making it suitable for many engineering applications.
References
[1] American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) (1993): Guide for design of pavement structures. – American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, DC 600p.
[2] Bathurst, R.J., Knight, M.A. (1998): Analysis of geocell reinforced-soil covers over large span conduits. – Computers and Geotechnics 22(3-4): 205-219.
[3] Binquet, J., Lee, K.L. (1975): Bearing capacity analysis of reinforced earth slabs. – Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division 101(12): 1257-1276.
[4] Biswas, A., Krishna, A.M. (2017): Geocell-reinforced foundation systems: a critical review. – International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 3(2): 19p.
[5] Chatterjee, K., Pratap Singh, A., Kumar, A. (2020): Geocells Applications in Enhancing Trafficability in Desert Soils. – In Geocells: Advances and Applications, Singapore: Springer Singapore 21p.
[6] Christopher, B.R., Schwartz, C.W., Boudreaux, R., Ryan, R.B. (2006): Geotechnical aspects of pavements (No. FHWA-NHI-05-037). – United States, Federal Highway Administration 598p.
[7] Congress, I.R. (2001): Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements. – Indian Code of Practice, IRC 40p.
[8] Cowland, J.W., Wong, S.C.K. (1993): Performance of a road embankment on soft clay supported on a geocell mattress foundation. – Geotextiles and Geomembranes 12(8): 687-705.
[9] Dash, S.K. (2010): Influence of relative density of soil on performance of geocell-reinforced sand foundations. – Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 22(5): 533-538.
[10] Dash, S.K., Krishnaswamy, N.R., Rajagopal, K. (2001): Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand. – Geotextiles and Geomembranes 19(4): 235-256.
[11] Dash, S.K., Sireesh, S., Sitharam, T.G. (2003): Model studies on circular footing supported on geocell reinforced sand underlain by soft clay. – Geotextiles and Geomembranes 21(4): 197-219.
[12] Deshmukh, R.R., Patel, S., Shahu, J.T. (2021): Field assessment of improvement in composite modulus of geosynthetic-reinforced pavements. – Geosynthetics International 28(6): 624-633.
[13] Gedela, R., Kalla, S., Sudarsanan, N., Karpurapu, R. (2021): Assessment of load distribution mechanism in geocell reinforced foundation beds using Digital Imaging Correlation Techniques. – Transportation Geotechnics 31: 15p.
[14] Gedela, R., Karpurapu, R. (2021): Laboratory and numerical studies on the performance of geocell reinforced base layer overlying soft subgrade. – International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering 7(1): 19p.
[15] Giroud, J.P. (1986): From geotextiles to geosynthetics: a revolution in geotechnical engineering. – In Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Geotextiles, Vienna 1: 1-18.
[16] Gourc, J.P., Arab, R., Giraud, H. (2001): Calibration and validation of design methods for geosynthetic-reinforced retaining structures using partial factors. – Geosynthetics International 8(2): 163-191.
[17] Guido, V.A., Chang, D.K., Sweeney, M.A. (1986): Comparison of geogrid and geotextile reinforced earth slabs. – Canadian Geotechnical Journal 23(4): 435-440.
[18] Han, J., Yang, X., Leshchinsky, D., Parsons, R.L. (2008): Behavior of geocell-reinforced sand under a vertical load. – Transportation Research Record 2045(1): 95-101.
[19] Hegde, A. (2017): Geocell reinforced foundation beds-past findings, present trends and future prospects: a state-of-the-art review. – Construction and Building Materials 154: 658-674.
[20] Hegde, A., Sitharam, T.G. (2015a): Use of bamboo in soft-ground engineering and its performance comparison with geosynthetics: experimental studies. – Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 27(9): 9p.
[21] Hegde, A., Sitharam, T.G. (2015b): Joint strength and wall deformation characteristics of a single-cell geocell subjected to uniaxial compression. – International Journal of Geomechanics 15(5): 8p.
[22] Hegde, A., Sitharam, T.G. (2015c): 3-Dimensional numerical modelling of geocell reinforced sand beds. – Geotextiles and Geomembranes 43(2): 171-181.
[23] Hegde, A.M., Palsule, P.S. (2020): Performance of geosynthetics reinforced subgrade subjected to repeated vehicle loads: experimental and numerical studies. – Frontiers in Built Environment 6: 11p.
[24] Hegde, A.M., Sitharam, T.G. (2015d): Effect of infill materials on the performance of geocell reinforced soft clay beds. – Geomechanics and Geoengineering 10(3): 163-173.
[25] Hufenus, R., Rueegger, R., Banjac, R., Mayor, P., Springman, S.M., Brönnimann, R. (2006): Full-scale field tests on geosynthetic reinforced unpaved roads on soft subgrade. – Geotextiles and Geomembranes 24(1): 21-37.
[26] IRC, S. (2019): 59: Guidelines for use of geosynthetics in road pavements and associated works. – In The Indian Road Congress, New Delhi 94p.
[27] Jones, C.J. (2005): Geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls and slopes: European Perspectives. – In International Perspectives on Soil Reinforcement Applications 15p.
[28] Kabiri Kouchaksaraei, M., Bagherzadeh Khalkhali, A. (2020): The effect of geocell dimensions and layout on the strength properties of reinforced soil. – SN Applied Sciences 2(10): 13p.
[29] Kief, O., Rajagopal, K., Veeraragavan, A., Chandramouli, S. (2011): Modulus improvement factor for geocell-reinforced bases. – Geosynthetics India 11: 22-24.
[30] Kief, O., Toan, B.T.D. (2011): Neoweb® 3D Cellular Confinement System for Structural Pavement Reinforcement of Roads & Railways. – Geotec. Hanoi 11p.
[31] Krishnaswamy, N.R., Rajagopal, K., Madhavi Latha, G. (2000): Model studies on geocell supported embankments constructed over a soft clay foundation. – Geotechnical Testing Journal 23(1): 45-54.
[32] Kumar, A., Saran, S. (2001): Isolated strip footing on reinforced sand. – Geotechnical Engineering 32(3): 177-190.
[33] Latha, G., Nair, A., Hemalatha, M. (2010): Performance of geosynthetics in unpaved roads. – International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 4(3): 337-349.
[34] Latha, G.M., Dash, S.K., Rajagopal, K. (2009): Numerical simulation of the behavior of geocell reinforced sand in foundations. – International Journal of Geomechanics 9(4): 143-152.
[35] Madhavi Latha, G., Rajagopal, K., Krishnaswamy, N.R. (2006): Experimental and theoretical investigations on geocell-supported embankments. – International Journal of Geomechanics 6(1): 30-35.
[36] Mamatha, K.H., Dinesh, S.V. (2019): Performance evaluation of geocell-reinforced pavements. – International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 13(3): 277-286.
[37] Mhaiskar, S.Y., Mandal, J.N. (1996): Investigations on soft clay subgrade strengthening using geocells. – Construction and Building Materials 10(4): 281-286.
[38] Mhaiskar, S.Y., Mandal, J.N. (1992): Soft clay subgrade stabilisation using geocells. – Geotechnical Special Publication 2(30): 1092-1103.
[39] Murthy, B.S., Sridharan, A., Singh, H.R. (1993): Analysis of reinforced soil beds. – Indian Geotechnical Journal 23(4): 447-458.
[40] Perkins, S.W. (1999): Mechanical response of geosynthetic-reinforced flexible pavements. – Geosynthetics International 6(5): 347-382.
[41] Pokharel, S.K., Han, J., Leshchinsky, D., Parsons, R.L. (2018): Experimental evaluation of geocell-reinforced bases under repeated loading. – International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology 11(2): 114-127.
[42] Pokharel, S.K., Han, J., Leshchinsky, D., Parsons, R.L., Halahmi, I. (2009): Behavior of geocell-reinforced granular bases under static and repeated loads. – In Contemporary Topics in Ground Modification, Problem Soils, and Geo-Support 8p.
[43] Pokharel, S.K., Martin, I., Norouzi, M., Breault, M. (2015): Validation of geocell design for unpaved roads. – In Proceedings of Geosynthetics 4p.
[44] Rai, M. (2010): Geocell-sand mattress overlying soft clay subgrade: behaviour under circular loading. – Dought-India, IIT Guwahati 262p.
[45] Rajagopal, K., Krishnaswamy, N.R., Latha, G.M. (1999): Behaviour of sand confined with single and multiple geocells. – Geotextiles and Geomembranes 17(3): 171-184.
[46] Rajagopal, K., Veeragavan, A., Chandramouli, S. (2012): Studies on geocell reinforced road pavement structures. – Geosynthetics Asia 6p.
[47] Saride, S., Rayabharapu, V.K., Vedpathak, S. (2015): Evaluation of rutting behaviour of geocell reinforced sand subgrades under repeated loading. – Indian Geotechnical Journal 45(4): 378-388.
[48] Shivashankar, R., Madhav, M.R., Miura, N. (1993): Reinforced granular beds overlying soft clay. – In Proceedings of 11th South East Asian Geotechnical Conference, Singapore 6p.
[49] Sitharam, T.G., Hegde, A. (2013): Design and construction of geocell foundation to support the embankment on settled red mud. – Geotextiles and Geomembranes 41: 55-63.
[50] Siabil, S.G., Tafreshi, S.M., Dawson, A.R. (2020): Response of pavement foundations incorporating both geocells and expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam. – Geotextiles and Geomembranes 48(1): 1-23.
[51] Sireesh, S., Sitharam, T.G., Dash, S.K. (2009): Bearing capacity of circular footing on geocell–sand mattress overlying clay bed with void. – Geotextiles and Geomembranes 27(2): 89-98.
[52] Sitharam, T.G., Sireesh, S. (2005): Behavior of embedded footings supported on geogrid cell reinforced foundation beds. – Geotechnical Testing Journal 28(5): 452-463.
[53] Suku, L., Prabhu, S.S., Ramesh, P., Babu, G.S. (2016): Behavior of geocell-reinforced granular base under repeated loading. – Transportation Geotechnics 9: 17-30.
[54] Tafreshi, S.M., Dawson, A.R. (2012): A comparison of static and cyclic loading responses of foundations on geocell-reinforced sand. – Geotextiles and Geomembranes 32: 55-68.
[55] Tafreshi, S.M., Dawson, A.R. (2010): Comparison of bearing capacity of a strip footing on sand with geocell and with planar forms of geotextile reinforcement. – Geotextiles and Geomembranes 28(1): 72-84.
[56] Tanyu, B.F., Aydilek, A.H., Lau, A.W., Edil, T.B., Benson, C.H. (2013): Laboratory evaluation of geocell-reinforced gravel subbase over poor subgrades. – Geosynthetics International 20(2): 47-61.
[57] Thallak, S.G., Saride, S., Dash, S.K. (2007): Performance of surface footing on geocell-reinforced soft clay beds. – Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 25(5): 509-524.
[58] Vidal, H. (1969): The principle of reinforced earth. – Highway Research Record 16p.
[59] Webster, S.L. (1981): Investigation of Beach Sand Trafficability Enhancement Using Sand-Grid Confinement and Membrane Reinforcement Concepts. Report 2. Sand Test Sections 3 and 4 (No. WESTRGL7920). – U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station 35p.
[60] Yoon, Y.W., Heo, S.B., Kim, K.S. (2008): Geotechnical performance of waste tires for soil reinforcement from chamber tests. – Geotextiles and Geomembranes 26(1): 100-107.
[61] Zhou, H., Wen, X. (2008): Model studies on geogrid-or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil. – Geotextiles and Geomembranes 26(3): 231-238.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 ANJALI GUNDALIYA, ALPA SHAH, MANISH SHAH

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.