ENHANCING CYBERSECURITY OF SMART CITY WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS USING BLOCKCHAIN AND PBFT CONSENSUS MECHANISM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjoest.v6i3.232Keywords:
blockchain security, water distribution systems, Byzantine fault tolerance, cyber attacks, smart citiesAbstract
This paper investigates cybersecurity attack models and defense strategies for water distribution systems (WDS) in smart city environments. As water infrastructure becomes increasingly digitized, it faces sophisticated cyber threats that could compromise system integrity and operational reliability. This study presents a systematic analysis of two prevalent attack vectors Denial of Service (DoS) and Man in the Middle (MITM) attacks and evaluates blockchain based defense mechanisms against these threats. Through experimental simulation using the C-town WDS model with 953 timestamp data points, we assess the vulnerability of water systems and the effectiveness of six consensus mechanisms: Proof of Work (PoW), Proof of Trust (PoT), Proof of Authority (PoA), Proof of Vote (PoV), Proof of Authentication (PoAuth), and Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT). The research quantifies attack impacts and demonstrates the superior resilience of PBFT, which achieved an 82.5% defense rate against DoS attacks and an 82.7% defense rate against MITM attacks, significantly outperforming alternative approaches. Furthermore, PBFT exhibited exceptional recovery capabilities with 71.1% recovery after DoS attacks and 89.3% recovery following MITM attacks. These findings provide valuable insights for implementing robust security frameworks that can maintain water system integrity even under sophisticated attack conditions.
References
[1] Alam, T. (2021): IBchain: Internet of things and blockchain integration approach for secure communication in smart cities. – Informatica 45(3): 10p.
[2] Al Mallah, R., López, D., Farooq, B. (2021): Cyber-security risk assessment framework for blockchains in smart mobility. – IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems 2: 294-311.
[3] Alnahari, M.S., Ariaratnam, S.T. (2022): The application of blockchain technology to smart city infrastructure. – Smart Cities 5(3): 979-993.
[4] Bahri, L., Girdzijauskas, S. (2018): When trust saves energy: a reference framework for proof of trust (PoT) blockchains. – In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018 5p.
[5] Chen, X., He, S., Sun, L., Zheng, Y., Wu, C.Q. (2024): A survey of consortium blockchain and its applications. – Cryptography 8(2): 25p.
[6] El Bekkali, A., Essaaidi, M., Boulmalf, M. (2023): A blockchain-based architecture and framework for cybersecure smart cities. – IEEE Access 11: 76359-76370.
[7] Huang, C., Xue, L., Liu, D., Shen, X., Zhuang, W., Sun, R., Ying, B. (2022): Blockchain-assisted transparent cross-domain authorization and authentication for smart city. – IEEE Internet of Things Journal 9(18): 17194-17209.
[8] Ismail, L., Materwala, H. (2019): A review of blockchain architecture and consensus protocols: Use cases, challenges, and solutions. – Symmetry 11(10): 47p.
[9] Kauf, S. (2021): Artificial Intelligence and blockchain for smart city. – Organizacja i Zarządzanie: Kwartalnik Naukowy 14p.
[10] Khanna, A., Sah, A., Bolshev, V., Jasinski, M., Vinogradov, A., Leonowicz, Z., Jasiński, M. (2021): Blockchain: Future of e-governance in smart cities. – Sustainability 13(21): 21p.
[11] Lashkari, B., Musilek, P. (2021): A comprehensive review of blockchain consensus mechanisms. – IEEE Access 9: 43620-43652.
[12] Li, K., Li, H., Wang, H., An, H., Lu, P., Yi, P., Zhu, F. (2020): PoV: An efficient voting-based consensus algorithm for consortium blockchains. – Frontiers in Blockchain 3: 16p.
[13] Lu, S.P., Lei, C.L., Tsai, M.H. (2024): An efficient Proof-of-Authority consensus scheme against cloning attacks. – Computer Communications 228: 17p.
[14] Mahmoud, H.H., Wu, W., Wang, Y. (2021): Wdschain: A toolbox for enhancing the security using blockchain technology in water distribution system. – Water 13(14): 18p.
[15] Mallik, A. (2018): Man-in-the-middle-attack: Understanding in simple words. – Cyberspace: Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi 2(2): 109-134.
[16] Obaid, H.S. (2020): Denial of service attacks: Tools and categories. – International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) 9(03): 631-636.
[17] Park, J.H., Yotxay, S., Singh, S.K., Park, J.H. (2024): PoAh-enabled federated learning architecture for DDoS attack detection in IoT networks. – Hum.-Centric Comput. Inf. Sci. 14(3): 24p.
[18] Sifah, E.B., Xia, H., Cobblah, C.N.A., Xia, Q., Gao, J., Du, X. (2020): BEMPAS: a decentralized employee performance assessment system based on blockchain for smart city governance. – IEEE Access 8: 99528-99539.
[19] Sun, J., Yan, J., Zhang, K.Z. (2016): Blockchain-based sharing services: What blockchain technology can contribute to smart cities. – Financial Innovation 2(1): 9p.
[20] Xiong, H., Chen, M., Wu, C., Zhao, Y., Yi, W. (2022): Research on progress of blockchain consensus algorithm: A review on recent progress of blockchain consensus algorithms. – Future Internet 14(2): 24p.
[21] Yu, H., Yang, Z., Sinnott, R.O. (2018): Decentralized big data auditing for smart city environments leveraging blockchain technology. – IEEE Access 7: 6288-6296.
[22] Zhou, S., Li, K., Xiao, L., Cai, J., Liang, W., Castiglione, A. (2023): A systematic review of consensus mechanisms in blockchain. – Mathematics 11(10): 27p.
[23] Zhou, Z., Onireti, O., Zhang, L., Imran, M.A. (2024): Slotted ALOHA Based Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) Blockchain Networks: Performance Analysis and Optimization. – Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 24(23): 20p.
[24] Zhuang, P., Zamir, T., Liang, H. (2020): Blockchain for cybersecurity in smart grid: A comprehensive survey. – IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 17(1): 3-19.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 AMINA ALAJWARY, FIRAS ALSHARBATY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
