METHODS FOR PREDICTING HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF NIGERIAN AGRICULTURAL SOILS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55197/qjoest.v6i1.195Keywords:
methods, predicting, hydraulic, conductivity, agricultural, soilsAbstract
Accurate prediction of hydraulic conductivity is very crucial for infiltration and runoff estimation. Factors which affect water infiltration in the soil include hydraulic conductivity, wetting front and soil sorptivity, ponding depth, depth to water table and impact of rain drops. Amongst these factors, the importance of hydraulic conductivity cannot be overemphasized. Hydraulic conductivity is one of the most important parameter for flow and transport related phenomena in soil. There is concern arising from the suitability, efficiency and ease of the different measuring methods under different conditions. The various methods of predicting hydraulic conductivity include field; laboratory and correlation methods each with individual merits and demerits. Although selection of a specific method for a particular application will depend on the objectives to be achieved, most researchers prefer direct measurement of soil hydraulic conductivity. The estimation of soil hydraulic conductivity using correlation method depends on the local soil maps, soil particle size distribution, organic matter content and bulk density. Field methods are usually more expensive than laboratory methods. Consequently, when the question of cost becomes decisive, or when actual representation of field conditions is not of fundamental importance and in-situ hydraulic conductivity is not available, laboratory methods may be used to predict the saturated hydraulic conductivity K. This study explains the various methods that can be used to predict hydraulic conductivity in-situ or within the laboratory.
References
Bagarello, V., Sgroi, A. (2004): Using the single-ring infiltrometer method to detect temporal changes in surface soil field-saturated hydraulic conductivity. – Soil and Tillage Research 76(1): 13-24.
Carrier III, W.D. (2003): Goodbye, hazen; hello, kozeny-carman. – Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering 129(11): 1054-1056.
Cirpka, O.A. (2003): Environmental fluid mechanics I: flow in natural hydrosystems. – Journal of Hydrology 283: 53-66.
Edoga, R.N. (2010): Comparison of saturated hydraulic conductivity measurement methods for Samaru-Nigeria soils. – Libyan Agriculture Research Center Journal International 1(14): 269-273.
Fetter, C.W. (2018): Applied hydrogeology. – Waveland Press 598p.
Fuentes, J.P., Flury, M., Bezdicek, D.F. (2004): Hydraulic properties in a silt loam soil under natural prairie, conventional till, and no‐till. – Soil Science Society of America Journal 68(5): 1679-1688.
Ibrahim, M.M., Aliyu, J. (2016): Comparison of Methods for saturated hydraulic conductivity determination: field, laboratory and empirical measurements (A Pre-view). – British Journal of Applied Science & Technology 15(3): 8p.
Idris-Nda, A. (2013): Estimating aquifer hydraulic properties in Bida Basin, Central Nigeria using empirical methods. – Earth Science Research 2(1): 209-221.
Odong, J. (2007): Evaluation of empirical formulae for determination of hydraulic conductivity based on grain-size analysis. – Journal of American Science 3(3): 54-60.
Osunbitan, J.A., Oyedele, D.J., Adekalu, K.O. (2005): Tillage effects on bulk density, hydraulic conductivity and strength of a loamy sand soil in southwestern Nigeria. – Soil and Tillage Research 82(1): 57-64.
Pinder, G.F., Celia, M.A. (2006): Subsurface hydrology. – John Wiley & Sons 484p.
Post, V., Kooi, H., Simmons, C. (2007): Using hydraulic head measurements in variable‐density ground water flow analyses. – Groundwater 45(6): 664-671.
Qi, S.P., Wen, Z.H., Lu, C.P.,Shu, L.C., Shao, J., Huang, Y., Zhang, S., Huang, Y. (2014): A new empirical model for estimating the hydraulic conductivity of low permeability media. – Proceedings of the International Association of Hydrological Sciences 368: 478-483.
Ritzema, H.P. (2006): Drainage principles and applications. – ILRI Publication 1124p.
Scanlon, B.R., Mace, R.E., Barrett, M.E., Smith, B. (2003): Can we simulate regional groundwater flow in a karst system using equivalent porous media models? Case study, Barton Springs Edwards aquifer, USA. – Journal of Hydrology 276(1-4): 137-158.
Šimůnek, J., Jarvis, N.J., Van Genuchten, M.T., Gärdenäs, A. (2003): Review and comparison of models for describing non-equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in the vadose zone. – Journal of Hydrology 272(1-4): 14-35.
Stibinger, J. (2014): Examples of determining the hydraulic conductivity of soils: Theory and applications of selected basic methods. – Jan Evangelista Purkyně University in Ústí nad Labem 72p.
Tayfun, A. (2005): Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity: A Study of Path Analysis in Clayey Soils. – Ataturk University Ziraat Fak.: Derg 36(1): 23-25.
Todd, D.K., Mays, L.W. (2004): Groundwater hydrology. – John Wiley & Sons 656p.
